|
Post by pwfirst on Feb 8, 2010 22:45:57 GMT -5
I think those are good choices. I have a Tascam 1641 and an old DP-01. The only down side is that you record on the Tascam 4 channel and then down load it to the computer to work with. One extra step. If you go with a direct interface no extra step and it will come with it's own soft wear. But having a portible unit Like the 4 channel , you can record any place. The 57 is good for intraments and vocal too. Good over all choice for a mic. Good luck and have fun Phil
|
|
|
Post by pwfirst on Feb 8, 2010 22:17:20 GMT -5
Hi Blackhorse: I have had an Audio Technica for a few years UHF with several channels and it works well. The less expensive ones have only one channel which can run into interferience problems with electrical and audio and TV. I bought mine used around $200 for a $500 unit. Shure always has good stuff to. Audio Technica has a new unit for $250. Phil
|
|
|
Post by pwfirst on Feb 8, 2010 11:58:10 GMT -5
Ditto. Phil
|
|
|
Post by pwfirst on Feb 8, 2010 11:46:09 GMT -5
Where do you get a wife like that? She is a keeper. You have Gibson, Get a Strat. Phil
|
|
|
Post by pwfirst on Feb 4, 2010 22:28:12 GMT -5
Instead of going with a mixer ,you might want to consider using a computer audio interface that you can plug into the computer. They come in USB, Firewire, and PCI flavors. Then you use a program to record and edit your songs. There are some free programs like audacity that work just fine. A really good program for $60 US is Raptor. Then the big boys, Pro tool, Acid, Sonar for a round $200 to $600. Phil
|
|
|
Post by pwfirst on Feb 4, 2010 16:23:43 GMT -5
Generaly I agree that buying a guitar without playing it is a mistake. There are some exceptions, One: if the price is great and you can afford to take it someware and have it fixed if it needs it. Two: if it is a rare guitar that you can't normally have access to. Three: if the return policy is good and has no hidden costs. Buying local is always the best. Develope a relationship with your local guitar guy and they can be a great resource. Phil
|
|
|
Post by pwfirst on Feb 4, 2010 11:13:01 GMT -5
Don't start that forum,I don't want to see my name at the top of the list. Phil
|
|
|
Post by pwfirst on Feb 3, 2010 16:02:03 GMT -5
I can never decide which one to take, so I go high tech with a POD XT live and usually use the fender black face mod and run it through the PA.. Guitar amps, unless they are mic'd only have a very narrow dispersion. say 45 to 60 degrees so unless you are standing infront of it , you don't hear every part. Since I am older now I don't like to carry anything too heavey. I know it's all digital but The sounds are endless with this thing. Phil
|
|
|
Post by pwfirst on Feb 3, 2010 14:59:46 GMT -5
Hi guys I am new to this great forum. Besides playing in a band in high school and now in church I do some recording in my studio. lesblues is right the sure 57 at $100 is a standard that every one is compared to. Two other options are the Audix 5- I at $115 and if you want really great sound the RODI NTA1 at $250 is very nice . Personally I use the Sure 57 through a tube pre amp and it is a very warm, full sound. It is great for accustics and electrics both and very durable. Phil
|
|
|
Post by pwfirst on Feb 3, 2010 12:53:01 GMT -5
What kind of music are you going to play should go into you decission making too. Go play some models before you buy. Make sure the neck is straight and comfortable for your hands. Then just enjoy it. Don't get tied up with brands too much. I personally like Fender Squires and Ibaneze for great entry level guitars. Enjoy Phil
|
|
|
Post by pwfirst on Feb 3, 2010 12:09:33 GMT -5
Hi guys, I am new to the forum. When I was back in college in the eary 70's I thought I needed an epiphone accustic 12 string to impress the girls at the camp fires. I traded in my 62 strat for it. The girls didn't last as long as the Strat would have. I still have nightmares. Phil
|
|