wully
Full Member
Posts: 119
|
Post by wully on Jan 18, 2010 12:59:59 GMT -5
Is it just me?
I don't get it at all.......
|
|
|
Post by Happy Jack on Jan 18, 2010 14:48:31 GMT -5
Does nowt for me neither - ugly front looks like a floorboard and the back looks like a guitar wearing DPMs
|
|
|
Post by Mojo on Jan 18, 2010 16:38:15 GMT -5
it's just not you. I have yet to read a review of anyone who likes the thing
|
|
|
Post by 469roadking on Jan 18, 2010 17:48:28 GMT -5
Yep, that's a file 13 if I ever saw one.
|
|
|
Post by WhiskeyHotel on Jan 18, 2010 18:22:02 GMT -5
I have to admit my first thought was "Yuck!"
|
|
|
Post by kevina on Feb 6, 2010 6:50:36 GMT -5
Forgetting the looks, the unconventional way that it is made, the technology of it. Have you heard the thing when it is mechanically tuning itself? It would be embarrassing haha.
Nice idea but I think only people with more money than sense would spend 4 grand on it when they get a much better guitar and loads of gear with that cash.
|
|
wully
Full Member
Posts: 119
|
Post by wully on Feb 6, 2010 12:57:55 GMT -5
Just think of all the kit you could get for that kind of money...
Instead of blowing it all on a clever guitar I'd some lessons - lots of lessons- and get my Tele humbuckered....
Oh- and treat myself to one of those Boss loop pedals, they look like a load of fun. ;D
|
|
|
Post by gasman on Feb 6, 2010 13:56:03 GMT -5
Gibson just seems to be coming up with gimmicks these days. Since I started reading about guitars and guitar makers on the net, I've grown not to like Gibson. If I ever buy a Gibson, it will be a used one. If I were to buy one new, it would be a Studio - nothing too expensive. I really don't want to give that company one red cent (but never say never).
|
|